Publishing Policy of Akapress Journal of Scientific Publishing

To browse it offline, download it from here

introduction

Akapress Journal of Scientific Publishing is a multidisciplinary, peer-reviewed, open-access, semi-annual scientific journal that publishes original research, reviews, and scientific articles in both Arabic and English.

The journal aims to contribute to the advancement of scientific knowledge in various disciplines while maintaining the highest standards of academic integrity and scientific excellence.

Scope of the journal:

Multidisciplinary scientific research encompassing natural and applied sciences (medicine, engineering, computer science, etc.), humanities, social sciences, Islamic and educational sciences.

Languages: Arabic and English.

Publishing form: Free access with two distinct paths:

PrePrint: Fast publication after initial screening.
Final Peer-Reviewed: A scientific peer review process.

General Publishing Terms

1. Types of accepted scientific papers

The journal accepts the following types of submissions:

Original Research Articles: New scientific studies that make significant contributions to knowledge.
Review articles: comprehensive systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Short correspondence: Brief reports of important preliminary findings.
Case studies: Detailed analysis of specific cases with broader implications.
Technical notes: Description of new methods, techniques, or technologies.

2. Preparing and formatting the scientific paper (final arbitration)

2.1 General coordination requirements

File format: Microsoft Word or PDF for mathematics research written in Latex
Font: Sakkal Majalla, size 14 for the main text and size 10 for footnotes in Arabic; Times New Roman, size 12 for the main text and size 10 for footnotes in English.
Spacing: Double spacing throughout the text.
Margins: 2.5 cm (1 inch) on all sides.
Page size: A4 (21 x 29.7 cm).
Length: 4,000-10,000 words for scientific papers (including references, tables, and figures).
Language: Scientific papers can be submitted in Arabic and/or English.
قوالب النشر باللغة العربية: للمقالات البحثية الأصيلة اضغط here للتحميل، لبقية النماذج العلمية القصيرة الأخرى اضغط here للتحميل
قوالب النشر باللغة الإنجليزية: للمقالات البحثية الأصيلة اضغط here للتحميل، لبقية النماذج العلمية القصيرة الأخرى اضغط here للتحميل

2.2 Structure of scientific papers

Title page: Title in both languages, authors' names and academic titles, including their workplace, email address, and orcid.org account.

Abstract: 150-250 words in both languages (Arabic and English).

Keywords: 4-6 keywords in both languages.

Main text: In accordance with the first clause and as follows:

2.2.1. Original research articles (Original Research Articles)

These are experimental or theoretical studies that make new and important contributions to the scientific field. These articles should follow a structure IMRAD Standard:

Abstract (Abstract): A brief and comprehensive presentation of the paper, including the objectives, methodology, key findings, and main conclusions.
the introduction (Introduction): Review the background and significance of the research, identify the research problem or knowledge gap, and clearly state the study objectives and hypotheses.
Materials and Methodology (Materials and Methods): A detailed and concise description of the experimental design, materials used, procedures followed, and data analysis methods. This section should be clear enough to enable other researchers to replicate the study.
Results (Results): An objective presentation of data and findings without interpretation or discussion. Tables and figures can be used to effectively illustrate data.
Discussion (Discussion): Analyze and interpret the results, linking them to hypotheses and previous literature. This section should address the significance of the results, the limitations of the study, and their implications, while providing recommendations for future research.
Conclusion (Conclusion): A brief summary of the most important findings of the research and a direct answer to the research question.
the reviewer (References): A list of all sources cited in the body of the paper, formatted according to the journal's standard style.

2.2.2. Review articles (Review Articles)

These are articles that provide a comprehensive and systematic critical review of the published literature on a particular topic. They include systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Abstract (Abstract): A structured summary that explains the objectives of the review, data sources, study selection criteria, data extraction methods, and main findings.
the introduction (Introduction): Clearly define the topic of the review and its importance, and pose the research question that the review aims to answer.
Review methodology (Methodology): A detailed description of how the review was conducted, including the study search strategy, databases used, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and procedures for assessing the quality of included studies. In the case of a meta-analysis, the statistical methods used must be described.
Display results and analysis (Results and Synthesis): Summarizing and integrating the results of the selected studies. This section can be organized by major themes or categories. In a meta-analysis, the combined statistical results are presented.
Discussion (Discussion): Critically evaluate the pooled findings, discuss variance between studies, identify gaps in the current literature, and review the theoretical and practical implications of the review.
Conclusion (Conclusion): Provide comprehensive conclusions based on the evidence reviewed.
the reviewer (References): A complete list of all studies cited.

2.2.3. Short correspondence (Short Communications)

These are brief reports intended to quickly disseminate preliminary results or important and new findings that are believed to require immediate attention from the scientific community.

Structure: They are typically less rigorous than original essays but must contain the essential elements: a brief introduction, a concise description of the methodology, a presentation of the main findings, and a brief discussion of their significance. They may not have clear subheadings but are presented as a continuous body of text following the abstract. They should be focused and straightforward.

2.2.4. Case studies (Case Studies)

They are in-depth, detailed analyses of an individual case or a small group of cases (such as a patient, an organization, or a particular event), which provide new insights or highlight unusual aspects of a phenomenon.

Abstract (Abstract): Brief description of the case, the problem it addresses, and the lessons learned.
the introduction (Introduction): Provide background on the case and its significance, and explain why it is worth studying.
Case description (Case Presentation): A detailed and comprehensive presentation of all aspects of the case relevant to the topic.
Analysis and discussion (Analysis and Discussion): Analyze the case in the context of existing literature, discuss theoretical or practical implications, lessons learned, and how it can contribute to a broader understanding of the topic.
Conclusion (Conclusion): Summarize the main points and implications of the case study.
the reviewer (References): List of relevant sources.

2.2.5. Technical Notes (Technical Notes)

These are papers that describe a new technology, method, procedure, or a modified and improved version of an existing technology. The goal is to share practical innovations with other researchers and practitioners.

Abstract (Abstract): A brief description of the new technology, its purpose and main features.
the introduction (Introduction): An explanation of the problem the new technology aims to solve or the shortcomings of existing technologies.
Technical description (Technical Description): A detailed and accurate step-by-step description of the new technique or procedure, supported by illustrations or diagrams if necessary, so that the reader can understand and apply it.
Application and features (Application and Advantages): Explain how to apply this technology and discuss its advantages over existing methods (e.g., increased accuracy, reduced cost, time saving).
Conclusion (Conclusion): A brief summary of the importance and contribution of technical observation.
the reviewer (References): Cite related works.

Acknowledgments: Sources of funding and acknowledgments (if any)

References: The researcher must adhere to the documentation mechanism that he deems appropriate for the subject of his study, such as: APA, MLA, etc., provided that the documentation mechanism is commercial and up to date.

Tables and Figures: Figures are presented in high-resolution visual quality, clearly labeled tables, according to the following conditions:
Terms and Conditions for Tables (Tables)

Tables are best suited for displaying large amounts of precise numerical data in an organized manner.

Numbering and naming (Numbering and Title):
1. Tables should be numbered sequentially as they appear in the text (Table 1, Table 2, and so on).
1. Each table must have Descriptive and brief title He writes above Table directly.
1. The title should clearly explain the content of the table without having to read the text.
Design and coordination (Design and Formatting):
1. Simplicity: Avoid excessive use of vertical lines. Use horizontal lines only to separate the table header and the beginning and end of the data.
1. Clarity: Column and row headings should be clear and concise. For example, state the units of measurement (e.g., mm, kg, %) in parentheses in the column or row heading.
1. Consistency: Maintain a consistent format across all tables (font type, size, and terminology).
Footnotes and notes (Footnotes and Notes):
1. Use footnotes below the table to explain abbreviations or symbols used (e.g., *, †, ‡) or to provide additional information about specific data.
1. You should explain what statistical tests were used to analyze the data presented.
Citation and source (Citation and Source):
1. If the table is adapted or modified from another study, The original source must be cited. Clearly state in a note below the table and obtain permission to republish if necessary.
Reference in the text (Reference in Text):
1. Each table must be referenced in the body of the research (e.g., “…as shown in Table 1”). Do not say “the table below” or “the following table.”.

Terms and Conditions for Forms (Figures)

Figures include all types of graphs, photographs, charts, and illustrations.

Numbering and naming (Numbering and Caption):
1. Figures should be numbered sequentially as they appear in the text (Figure 1, Figure 2, and so on).
1. Each shape must have Caption (Caption) It is written lowest The shape.
1. The label must accurately describe the content of the figure and indicate all symbols, abbreviations, and fonts used in it.
Quality and accuracy (Quality and Resolution):
1. High accuracy: All forms must be submitted in very high resolution (usually 300 DPI For color and grayscale images, 600-1200 DPI For line drawings) This ensures that they appear clearly when printed.
1. Coordination: Files in popular formats such as: TIFF, JPEG (high quality), or EPS
Content and Design (Content and Design):
1. Clarity: All text, axes, and symbols within the figure should be clear and easy to read, even when scaled down. Use contrasting fonts and colors.
1. Scales and axes: All X and Y axes must be clearly labeled with units of measurement.
1. Microscopic images: In micrographs, you must add: measuring tape (Scale bar) To illustrate magnification.
Ethics and credibility (Ethics and Integrity):
1. Manipulating images is strictly prohibited. In a way that distorts or falsifies the original results.
1. Only minor adjustments that improve overall clarity (such as adjusting brightness and contrast) are allowed to be applied to the entire image.
Citation and source (Citation and Source):
1. As with tables, if the figure is adapted from a previous work, permission must be obtained from the copyright holder and the original source must be clearly cited in the caption.

3. Application process

3.1 Online Application

All scientific papers must be submitted through the system. Electronic submission of the journal.
Authors must create an account and complete all required fields.
Scientific papers must be submitted as individual PDF/Word files to comply with the publication requirements.

3.2 Required documents

Scientific paper.
Conflict of interest statement.
A letter of commitment confirming that this work is original and prepared by the researcher himself and has not been submitted to another publication (if any).
Authors' contribution statement.

Terms and Conditions for Publishing Tracks

4. Initial arbitration process (PrePrint)

4.1 Scope and Purpose

The preliminary peer review process provides rapid publication of scientific papers, facilitating early scientific communication and obtaining feedback from the scientific research community.

4.2 Review process

Initial screening: The editorial board reviews the basic criteria for writing a scientific paper, relevance to the topic, and basic quality.
Timeline: 5-7 business days for initial decision.
Non-peer reviewed: Articles are not subject to a formal peer review process.
Classification: All articles are clearly marked as “preliminary peer review”.

4.3 Admission criteria

Original research that has not been submitted for publication on another platform that uses DOIs.
Relevance to the scope of the journal.
The soundness of the underlying methodology of the scientific paper.
Ethical Standards: Compliance with Research Ethics

5. Final arbitration process (Final Peer-Reviewed)

5.1 Scientific arbitration system

Double-blind review: Neither the authors nor the reviewers know each other's identities.
Minimum number of arbitrators: Two independent expert arbitrators.
Third arbitrator: appointed in case of conflicting recommendations.
Review timeline: 6-8 weeks for initial review, 3-4 weeks for revisions.

5.2 Review Standards

Originality: A new contribution to the field.
Methodology: It should be a sound research methodology.
Significance: The importance and impact of the results.
Clarity: Clear presentation and logical flow.
Ethical standards: Compliance with scientific research ethics.

5.3 Editorial Board Decisions

Acceptance: Acceptance of the scientific paper without modification.
Substantial modification: reconsideration of methodology or results.
Minor modification: Minor modifications are required.
Rejection: The paper is not suitable for publication.

Ethical Standards and Policies

6. Plagiarism Policy (Plagiarism)

6.1 Plagiarism Detection

Initial Screening: All submissions undergo a plagiarism check (mention plagiarism detection tool) by the editorial staff.
Similarity thresholds:
<15%: Generally accepted with appropriate citations.
15-30%: Requires editorial review and possible revision.
>30%: Possible rejection unless there are exceptional circumstances. (Except where the text was from the same researcher's previous research)

6.2 Types of plagiarism

Textual plagiarism: copying text without proper citation.
Self-plagiarism: Reusing one's own work without disclosing it.
Data spoofing: Using other people's data without permission.
Plagiarism: taking over someone else's concepts without attribution.

6.3 Exceptions

The following categories of texts are exempt from being considered plagiarism when examined, with: Emphasizing the need for accurate attribution (Citation) For its sources:

Sacred religious texts:
1. Quranic verses, hadiths, and texts quoted from other holy books are essential for Islamic and human studies.
Legal and official documents:
1. Constitutional provisions, texts of laws and legislation, clauses of international treaties and agreements, and judicial rulings, as academic accuracy requires that these texts be transmitted verbatim without change.
Standard materials and fixed terms:
1. Mathematical equations Chemical formulas and globally recognized physical laws.
1. Scientific names For vehicles, organisms, and standardized technical terms.
1. Standard protocols and procedures Followed in scientific experiments.
Commonly used phrases:
1. Popular proverbs, sayings, and idioms that have become part of the public intellectual property.

Important note: Excluding these texts does not exempt the researcher from His moral and scientific duty is to document it fully. In accordance with the journal's approved documentation style, the goal is to distinguish between legitimate quotations that serve the research context and plagiarism of ideas and intellectual efforts of others.

6.4 Consequences

Minor plagiarism: Authors are asked to review and resubmit.
Major plagiarism: immediate rejection.
Post-publication disclosure: withdraw the scientific paper and notify the scientific institution to which the researcher is affiliated.

7. AI Generated Content Policy

7.1 Disclosure Requirements

Authors must disclose any use of AI tools in preparing the scientific paper (for more, please see the draft AI Use Policy, 3.3 Disclosure Requirements)
The assistance of artificial intelligence in preparing the scientific paper must be acknowledged.
The allowance ratio is indicated (10% – 15%).
AI cannot be listed as an author (the researcher must rephrase the text in their own editorial style)

7.2 Acceptable Uses

Assist with language editing and proofreading.
Data analysis support (under human supervision).
Help finding references.
Design modern tools, shapes, or drawings to help implement an experiment, or illustrate an idea, result, or piece of information.
Translation.

7.3 Unacceptable Uses

AI-generated text presented as original work.
Data or results generated by artificial intelligence.
Analysis conducted by artificial intelligence without human verification.
The reviewer's request to the researcher – when there is doubt about the researcher's results or methodology ”in light of artificial intelligence” – is to provide him with everything related to the preparation of the methodology and results, such as questionnaires, documents, and the like.

Note: The journal has prepared a draft policy on the use of artificial intelligence in scientific research, as a reference for authors and referees.

8. Research Ethics

8.1 Medical Experimental Research (Human Subjects)

Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval is required.
Informed consent documents.
Protect privacy and confidentiality.
Considerations for vulnerable groups.

8.2 Medical Experimental Research (Animal Category)

Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) approval.
Commitment to international animal welfare standards.
Justify the use of animals.
Minimize animal suffering.

8.3 Data Management

Data availability statement required.
Raw data should be deposited in public repositories whenever possible.
Data sharing agreements for sensitive data.
Long-term data preservation plans, a service provided by the journal's technical editorial assistants upon publication request.

Publication and support fees

9. Fee structure

9.1 Scientific paper arbitration fees (APC)

Final Jury Track: $80 for natural and applied sciences, and $40 for humanities majors such as education, management, and literature.
Initial review process: US$2-6 per paper (depending on the scientific discipline and language of publication; the price list is available at the link). here).
Local Currency: The above amounts are accepted in local currency (Yemeni Riyal) for researchers within Yemen only.

9.2 Exemptions and Discounts for the Final Publication Path

Yemeni researchers:

50% discount for authors affiliated with Yemeni institutions.
50% Exemption for Students and Early Career Researchers from Yemen.
35% discount for international cooperation involving Yemeni institutions.

Other developing countries:

50% discount for authors from least developed countries (LDCs) includes:

Afghanistan, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Central African Republic, Chad, Congo, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Gambia, Guinea-Bissau, Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Liberia, Madagascar, Malawi, Mali, Mozambique, Niger, Rwanda, Somalia, South Sudan, Sudan, Syrian Arab Republic, Togo.

20% Discount for Authors from Lower-Middle-Income Countries:

Albania, Algeria, Angola, Argentina, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bangladesh, Belarus, Belize, Benin, Bhutan, Bolivia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Botswana, Brazil, Bulgaria, Cabo Verde, Cambodia, Cameroon, China, Colombia, Comoros, Congo, Republic of the Congo, Costa Rica, Côte d'Ivoire, Cuba, Djibouti, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, Arab Republic of Egypt, El Salvador, Equatorial Guinea, Eswatini, Fiji, Gabon, Georgia, Ghana, Grenada, Guatemala, Guinea, Guyana, Haiti, Honduras, India, Indonesia, Iran, Islamic Republic of Iran, Iraq, Jamaica, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Kiribati, Kosovo, Kyrgyz Republic, Lao People's Democratic Republic, Lebanon, Lesotho, Libya, Malaysia, Maldives, Marshall Islands, Mauritania, Mauritius, Mexico, Micronesia, Federated States of Micronesia, Moldova, Mongolia, Montenegro, Morocco, Myanmar, Namibia, Nepal, Nicaragua, Nigeria, North Macedonia, Pakistan, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Russian Federation, Samoa, São Tomé and Príncipe, Senegal, Serbia, Sierra Leone, Solomon Islands, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Suriname, Tajikistan, Tanzania, Thailand, Timor-Leste, Tonga, Tunisia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Tuvalu, Uganda, Ukraine, Uzbekistan, Vanuatu, Venezuela, Vietnam, West Bank and Gaza Strip, Zambia, Zimbabwe.

Special circumstances:

Financial hardship exemptions are available upon request.
Conference Partner Discounts.
Corporate Membership Discounts.

10. Copyright and License

10.1 Copyright Policy

Authors retain copyright to their works.
The journal obtains publishing rights through a licensing agreement.
Authors may reuse their work with appropriate attribution.

10.2 Creative Commons License (Creative Commons)

Default license: CC BY 4.0 (Attribution 4.0 International).
Alternative options: CC BY-SA, CC BY-NC (upon request).
Open Access: All articles are freely available upon publication.

10.3 Permissions

Authors are responsible for obtaining permissions for copyrighted material.
Appropriate attribution is required for all quoted content.
Fair use guidelines are followed for educational and research purposes.

Editorial organization

11. Editorial Board Structure

11.1 Unified Editorial Board

Editor-in-Chief: General supervision of the journal and final decisions.
Deputy Editors: Supervising areas of specialization.
Associate Editors: Manuscript handling and review coordination.
Editorial Advisory Board: Strategic guidance and policy development.
Editor-in-Chief: Operational management and production supervision.

11.2 Composition of the Editorial Board

International representation across disciplines.
Bilingual abilities (Arabic-English).
Experience in the areas of specialization of both tracks.
Regional representation including the Middle East and North Africa.
Gender and institutional diversity.

12. Publication frequency and schedule

12.1 Publication Schedule

Initial frequency: semi-annual (two issues per year).
Growth Plan: Publish quarterly as order volume increases.
Special Issues: Thematic issues as required.
Continuous Publishing: The First Online Publishing Model.

12.2 Work Schedule

First Arbitration Process: 1-7 days from receipt to posting.
Final review process: 8-12 weeks from receipt to acceptance for publication.
Fast Track Option: Available for urgent public health or safety issues (incurs an additional 20% publication fee above)
Indexing and publishing

13. Target databases

13.1 Objectives of Primary Indexing

Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) is a key goal within two years.
Google Scholar: Instant inclusion.
Scopus: Long-term goal (3-5 years).
Web of Science: Ultimate Goal (5-7 years).

13.2 Regional and specialized databases

Arab Citation Index (ACI)
Islamic World Science Citation Center (ISC)
CrossRef assigns a digital object identifier (DOI) to all scientific papers.
ORCID: Author Identification Integration.

14. Quality Assurance

14.1 Continuous Improvement

Annual editorial review.
Regular policy updates based on international standards.
Integrate reader and author feedback.
Monitor compliance with indexing requirements.

14.2 Transparency and Accountability

Open review option (upon author's request).
Transparency of editorial decisions.
Disclosure of conflicts of interest.
Regular editorial reports.

Contact information

Email: contact@acaprs.net

Website: www.acaprs.net

Application system: https://acaprs.net/register/

Publisher: Hassan Al-Bayti Foundation for Educational Consultations and Student Services, Al-Mukalla City, Hadhramaut Governorate, Republic of Yemen

Contact Number: 00967717204590 | 00967734460129

Document version: 1.0

Effective date: October 23, 2025